Last night I worked in the kitchen, making nut milk and chopping veggies and cleaning. It was fun, even if I'm not normally willing to do that level of work. I was thinking it would be fun to get a dehydrator to make things for other people, like breads and cookies and burgers (mock meat type things). Some of these things are actually pretty easy to make, you just have to sprout the grain first, then run it through a juicer with a homogenizing function, which I have. The crew I was with was also fun, this guy was singing Beetles songs Metallica-style, I loved it. I thought it would be tiring to be around food so much, but I wasn't in the mood for food at all and it wasn't a big deal, I just worked without trying anything.
I read two books yesterday--one was "Raw Family" by the Boutenkos. Really interesting, they had all these health problems (including type 1 diabetes) and went raw overnight and it fixed their problems pretty quickly, after the detox. I think they are honest. I always wonder when people do something so extreme overnight, but here you could see that they were very desperate (and hadn't really wanted to make the change--they *had* to try). However, they advocate others going raw like they did (so suddenly), and I think it's because the cooked food they ate was so disgusting. Sausages and other omnivorous Russian things. Not lentil and spinach stew, or steamed kale with roasted cashews. No wonder they got sick every time they tried cooked food.
The other book I read started out being incredibly good--"Balance point: the search for a spiritual missing link" by Joseph Jenkins. I had wanted to buy it for a bunch of people I knew. It is basically a true story novelized--a man is left an inheritance by a dead aunt, who sends him on what he skeptically considers a wild goose chase. She was working to basically prevent ecocide. The end was such a let-down, after getting in deep to our ecological problems. Basically it suggests saving the world with green consumerism--recycle, compost, etc--what I consider child-level environmentalism. It still might to be good for people who are very ignorant. The main character is very skeptical, so many people will be able to relate to him (I was very annoyed).
So, interesting parts--they talked about how ecological destruction is exponential, which makes it difficult to see. For example, humans have been growing exponentially for a while, but just recently have we been able to see how fast it is going. It is just too difficult to grasp. But realizing this helps us see that ecological destruction isn't linear, so will happen much more quickly than we expect (in the book we have until about 2040, who knows). Also that the earth is heating up in the same way *we* heat up when we have a fever--purposefully, to kill the pathogen. It doesn't say we have to be pathogens, but that we are acting that way.
They also go to Peru (interestingly--since I am going there for a month). They meet up with Eduardo, a shaman:
"Humanity is worshiping itself when it believes that a human created everything, when it believes in a human God. We are like the microbes believing in their microbe God [an analogy he used earlier]. True spiritual development occurs when we realize that we are a part of something greater than us, and we strive to understand the true nature of that greater Being. As long as we cling to the myth of the Great Human, as long as we believe that the larger level of Being is just another level of human-ness, we convince ourselves that there is nothing greater than us. Then we spiritually stagnate. We cannot co-evolve without cooperating with the rest of Life. The Great Human myth makes us believe we are superior to the rest of Life. The Great Human myth makes us believe we are superior to the rest of Life, that we don't have to cooperate. However, we are not superior, and we must cooperate with the Earth mother if we are to survive."
Another character-"Religion, on the other hand, is often based on a relationship between oneself and an imaginary creator deity that people call God. Eduardo's saying that since a human creator isn't nay more realistic than a microbe one, any relationship we have to such a deity is only imaginary. If I understand him correctly, a true spiritual relationship can only exist between yourself and something that actually exists. You can't have a realistic relationship with an imaginary being. He says the Earth mother is a greater being that actually exists, and by extension, so is the Great Mystery, which is the totality of a universe as we know it today...No, I wouldn't say that [he's an atheist]. He believes in a supreme being, but it's a natural one rather than a human one. A real one rather than a imaginary one. To him, 'God' is the totality of existance, not just another human male. And by maintaining a reverence for that greater Being in his life, he tries to live in harmony with the natural world around him. That's why he says we're spiritually lost. We don't have reverence for the natural world. Instead, we worship dead humans and , in the meantime, ignore our destructive effects on the planet. It does seem really silly when you think about it."
I was talking to someone here about the book and ecological collapse and he made a point I hadn't thought of in regards to fasting. Basically, every time you fast, you lower your metabolism, which I knew is excellent for aging more slowly. But he pointed out that it would also help someone survive a collapse. And if you had a manual juicer, you could juice wild greens (also, any true grass is juice-able) and survive for months that way. The more you had fasted beforehand, the longer you would be able to keep doing that. I appreciate that aspect--versus the typical mentality found in pop culture of eating 5-6 times a day to raise your metabolism for weight loss. Not healthy. Caloric restriction is healthiest, uses the least resources, and might be a necessity someday.
I was remembering how I was almost vested in my retirement account. I don't really know what that means, they would have doubled the amount in there and I could have kept more (maybe?). If I had stayed just a few more weeks, I would have reached three years exactly and gotten vested, which is what my mom wanted me to do. And instead of having this wonderful experience, I would have a more solid chunk of something that probably won't exist when it's time to claim it! What a horrible, greed-based decision that would have been. I'm so glad I came here instead.